The report of Naresh Chandra Task Force on
Security has sparked a tussle between the South Block babus and the armed
forces. The report has recommended to appoint more uniformed officers in the Defence
Ministry to increase their say in national security decision making and to
replace civilian Defence Secretary by Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) as ‘a single
source of advice’ for the Defence Minister and the Prime Minister.
The committee led by former cabinet secretary Naresh Chandra
lamented that despite the service chiefs and the highly specialized Service Head
Quarters’ staff being at their disposal for advice in the management of
national security the political establishment is totally relying on the
feedback of Defence Ministry civil servants, drawn from diverse backgrounds.
“According to the report the service headquarters are
excluded from the apex structure. The Services have limited access to the
political establishment, and can make little or no contribution to national
security decision-making,” sources said. To cure the problem, the report
suggests posting of more armed forces officers in the ministry, a fact that has
not found much acceptance amongst the bureaucracy.
Informed sources told The Sunday Standard, to enhance the
status of service Chiefs in decision making processes the Task Force has also
recommended the amendments in Business Rules - the “Government of India
Allocation of Business Rules” (AoB Rules), and the “Government of India
Transaction of Business Rules” (ToB Rules), framed in 1961 under the
constitutional powers of the President of India. As per the present
arrangement, the three Service Chiefs find no mention in the Business Rules,
what is their status and standing vis-à-vis the Defence Secretary – who under
the rules is responsible for the “Defence of India and every part thereof?”
“Over the past 64 years, it has become quite clear that the three
Service Chiefs are to be accorded the courtesies due to their rank and position,
and allowed to administer and operationally deploy their respective Services.
However, since they have no locus standi as per Business Rules, their input to
the decision-making of the four MoD Departments remain marginal.
“So much so, that the Secretary Department of Defence is
deemed to represent the three Services in most forums, and the Departments of DRDO
as well as Defence Production need not seek or abide by their advice,” sources
added.
With India inching towards completing its nuclear triad and
acquiring strategic weapons like inter-continental Ballistic Missile (ICBM)
Agni-V, the criticality of the post of CDS – the Chief’s of the three service
chiefs – has increased. As per the report, the CDS will have direct access to
the Defence Minister rather than channeling his advice through the Defence Secretary.
“The present system of Chairman CoSC (Chiefs of Staff
Committee) is not working well. As the senior-most among the three Chiefs take
over as CoSC Chairman he is at the helm of affairs from one to 20 months
depending on his residual service.
“In the coming times CoSC will become important in the Chain
of command for nuclear weapons; and hence the urgency for CDS,” sources added.
In order to iron out the objections raised by the Indian Air Force (IAF) opposing
the move, the report suggests appointing the seniormost Chief among the three
services to be appointed as CDS and his immediate junior be handed over the rein
of that service.
The Government had in June 2011, appointed the Naresh Chandra
Committee, and comprising of former defence officers like Admiral Arun Prakash,
Air Chief Marshal S Krishnaswamy and former Director General of Military
Operations Lt Gen VR Raghvan and bureaucrats like Brajeshwar and Vinod K Dugga,
to revisit the defence reforms process and the report of the committee was
recently submitted the Prime Minister. The report has been circulated to the
various concerned ministries and finally it would be considered by the Cabinet
Committee on Security (CCS). A public version of the report is likely to be
made available soon for an open discourse, sources indicated.
the recommendation is very constructive you in the media should help the armed forces to achieve it.By the way despite being a civilian your defence coverage is good
ReplyDeleteMadam your support is required please write with more vigour in favour of the recommendations you will do a service to the nation
ReplyDeleteI am with no political leanings but can say with conviction that the BJP Government gave the nation the Nuclear Bomb for deterrence and enhanced India's position on the world stage and with a more robust economy PM Vajpayee as India's C-In-C took interest in national security. UPA has left it to the NSAs and RM and it appears the PM is a EOGM or Committee man so we cane expect procrastination .In security decisions UPA Chairperson too is not in the loop.......a danger lurks in the long term neglect.
ReplyDeleteA ITALIAN HOUSEWIFE WITH A WAITRESS BACKGROUND ,WITH A SICK
ReplyDeleteSARDAR AT HER BEHEST SURROUNDED BY A BUNCH OF THIEVES AS MINISTERS CANNOT BE EXPECTED TO RUN A PROFESSIONAL SET UP
OF A GREAT EMERGING POWER. WITH HER MINDSET AND PRIORITIES
SHE CAN ONLY HAVE A FEUDAL SYSTEM WHERE HER SON CAN SIT ON THE THRONE AND POVERTY CHAMPIONED FOR VOTE BANK AND MINORITY POLITICS