Showing posts with label Age Row. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Age Row. Show all posts

Sunday, May 27, 2012

The General goes home

BAPORA VILLAGE (BHIWANI, HARYANA): General Vijay Kumar Singh comes from a Rajput family of this quaint village whose generations have proudly served in the Indian Army. But now there is anguish among the village patriarchs, and none of the younger generation wants to join the force after seeing the controversy that hit the “upright officer”.


“Earlier, my father and his five brothers had served in the army and we three cousins, including Vijay, were in the force. Now after he retires, only his nephew will be there and we also do not want anybody else to join,” said Hari Singh, the Army Chief’s cousin. The septuagenarian, sporting handlebar moustache and sitting too upright for his age, has seen the bloody war of 1962 and retired as a Sipahi from the Army.

Said to be about 700-year-old, Bapora with a population of about 20,000 has soldiery in its blood with the village sending scores of valiant Rajputs to the Army. Locating the Army Chief’s home, about 160 km west of Delhi, is not difficult. Reach Bhiwani and ask anybody where is General Sahab’s village and one will be automatically guided to his modest pink and yellow house, equipped with bare minimum things. Only his drawing room seemed to have got a new sofa few years ago.

“What did he (the Army Chief) get for being honest? See his home; he has not added any property in his career, everything is ancestral. Had it not been the case, politicians would have fixed him by now for standing up against corruption,” his other cousin Honorary Captain (retd) Krishan Pal Singh chipped in. He was a jawan in 25 Rajput and was deployed as part of Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka along with the Army Chief. Gen Singh was awarded a Yudh Sena Medal for his stellar role in the operations in the island nation.


The village is proud of the General’s achievement as he is the first to have risen to the highest rank; earlier his father Col Jagat Singh was the highest-ranking army officer from the village. In his career spanning 42 years, the Army Chief has always topped the merit list. He is a graduate of the Wellington-based Defence Services Staff College as well as the US Army War College at Carlisle. He also did a Rangers Course, a prestigious commando training, at Fort Benning in the US.

Now the village is preparing for a grand party post the General’s retirement. “We will honour the son of the soil with a grand function. People from nearby villages also want to be part of the function,” said Tejbir Singh, who also sat on a dharna at Jantar Mantar in Delhi last month in support of the Army Chief. “I had asked the General to get my son recruited in Army as jawan. He said if somebody is fit, he will get chance on his own. I will not recommend anybody. He is that honest,” Tejbir Singh added.


The whole lane of houses in Gen Singh’s village sends at least one person to the Army and the General makes it a point to meet all the ex-servicemen, including 90-year-old Capt (retd) Gugam Singh who is unable to move due to old age now. The villagers have one proposition for the government to make the son of the soil President—the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces. “President should be somebody outside of politics. There can be no better candidate than the General. However, even if he decides to join politics, we are with him,” said Krishan Pal.

End of an Era

When Army Chief General V K Singh hangs his boots on May 31, an era of Indian military history will come to an end —as he would be the last of the Army Chiefs to have seen action in India’s last full-fledged war of 1971. His successor Lt Gen Bikram Singh was commissioned into the force in 1972. 



As a young Sub Lieutenant in the Rajput Regiment in 1971, General Singh had started training the Mukti Bahini army for the liberation of former East Pakistan on June 19. The experience in the 1971 war laid down the foundations of a keen strategist that he is known as presently. “Just before the war, Vijay had come to the village on leave. And he especially went and bought a lungi so that he can easily mix with the Mukti Bahini troops he was going to train,” said his cousin Krishan Pal Singh.

Also during 1971 war, one of his fellow officers had stepped on an anti-personnel mine and got blown up. He was severely injured and the General—then a young Sub-Lieutenant—carried him on his shoulder all the way to hospital. The officer lost a limb but survived to tell the tale of General Singh’s dedication towards his troops and fellow officers.

In 2011 when V K Singh again set foot on Bangladeshi soil as the Indian Army Chief, he carried along with him some “relics of 1971 war” to gift his Bangladeshi counterpart.

“Participating in an operation gives an army officer an experience which no amount of theory or courses can impart. So in that sense this experience will definitely be missed in the higher echelons of the Indian Army,” said an officer. The Army Chief, first commando to rise to the highest rank, later took part in Operation Pawan of the Indian Peacekeeping Force in Sri Lanka against LTTE. “He is an expert in operations and planning and using the arms to their maximum. He turned all the rifles into LMG (Light Machine Guns) in Sri Lanka; even the LTTE guerillas were scared of him,” said Krishan Pal who had accompanied him as part of the troops who had gone to the island nation.

The Army Chief had learnt his first lessons of the war in 1971. The 13-day Bangladesh Liberation war in 1971 is one of the shortest wars in the modern history that also resulted in the formation of a new country. During the war, the Indian armed forces fought in both the eastern and western frontier before the Pakistani Army signed an Instrument of Surrender, and over 90,000 Pakistani soldiers were taken as Prisoners of War by India.

As a build-up to this, thousands of Bangladeshis were given shelter in refugee camps on the Indian side. These camps were used for training the fighters of the Mukti Bahini.

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Suhag should reply to notice rather than going to media: Army Chief

Denying any infighting in top brass of the Indian Army, Army Chief General VK Singh on Friday said that the show cause notice to Lt Gen Dalbir Singh Suhag – slated to take over as Army Chief in 2014, is a routine matter and his junior officer was not justified in “brandishing” it to the media.



Asked if the show cause notice was his “personnel vendetta” against senior Army officer, General Singh told the Defence Express: “Let me tell you some hard facts about the show cause notice. It sent on certain grounds from a senior officer to a junior officer. It is the moral duty of the junior officer to reply to the show cause notice rather than going and brandishing it to the media.”

The General was speaking on the sidelines of a book release function. The book is called “Assault of merit” and chronicles various cases of decorated officers being superseded or short-changed by an insensitive bureaucracy and civil government.

The show cause notice issued by the Army Chief just a week before his retirement has raised quite a few eyebrows in the defence establishment. The incumbent General Officer in Commanding of Dimapur-based 3 Corps, Lt Gen Suhag has been alleged of “abdicating responsibility” in handling an intelligence and surveillance unit in a “most unprofessional and lackadaisical manner”.

Lt Gen Suhag has six days to reply to this show cause notice.

The General has also sought to put a Disciplinary and Vigilance ban on Suhag that will stall his appointment as the Eastern Army Commander after the incumbent and Chief-designate Lt Gen Bikram Singh moves to New Delhi to take over the reins of the 1.2 million-strong Indian Army. In reply to a query that the show cause notice will impinge of the Army’s line of succession, the General remarked: “There is no line of succession in the Indian Army.”

This was the second time that Lt Gen Suhag has come under fired from the Army Chief. Earlier General Singh in his CBI complaint has accused the Lt Gen of misappropriation of funds in purchase of parachutes while heading the Special Frontier Force (SFF) and has requested a probe against him. The accusation came even as the Army Head Quarter under him recommended Lt Gen Suhag for the same post. The Cabinet Secretariat later turned down the request for inquiry as saying the alleged procurement had not been done.

However, the Ministry of Defence - that so far has refrained from interfering in the matter - is said to have taken “cognizance” of the issue. The Defence Ministry says that there has been a precedence of a succeeding Army Chief lifting a DV ban put by his predecessor. Former army chief General Deepak Kapoor had put a DV ban against present Deputy Army Chief Lt Gen RS Halgali only to be revoked by General Singh. General Singh in fact cleared his appointment as Deputy Army Chief.

The Army Chief, who will hang his boots on May 31 after 42 years of eventful and controversy-riddled carrier, also dismissed suggestions of “infighting” amongst the top echelons of the force. “There is no infighting in the Army. Lots of things are unnecessary blown up by the media,” General Singh added. Earlier this year in an interview, the Chief had blown up the lid from the Tatra scam and has alleged that army chiefs before him had taken money.

The Army Chief also dared Lt Gen (retd) Tejinder Singh to produce any evidence whatsoever about the General intercepting the phone calls of the Defence Minister AK Antony and Congress president Sonia Gandhi at the peak of the age controversy.”Tell Tejinder Singh to not to spread lies. If he has the evidence, ask him to produce it.”

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Happy Birthday General! Army Chief to end it where it all began

While uncertainty looms over how many candles Army Chief General VK Singh will have on his birthday cake today, what he is going to do on his last day of his tenure is certain. The General will review the passing out parade of the premier training institution National Defence Academy (NDA) – where lies the genesis of his age controversy.

General Singh will hand over the command of the 1.12 million-strong Indian Army to his successor Lt Gen Bikram Singh on May 31, a day when the normally the passing out parade takes place at the cradle of Indian armed forces - the NDA, Khadakwasla at Pune. The cadets passing out of the tri-service institution then join various service institutions like Indian Military Academy, Air Force Academy, Indian Naval Academy. 





Sources told the Defence Express that the summer passing out parade of the NDA has now been scheduled a day earlier on May 30, so that the Army Chief can review the parade.

Even as General Singh remains, the only army chief with two year of births – 1950 and 1951 – sources close to him indicate that the feeling of being wronged by the system is still there.

"It was 46 years ago on July 1, 1966 that the Army Chief had joined NDA, a place where it (the controversy for date of birth) all began. So there could be no better place to be on his last day in service," sources added.

The controversy of age that has been plaguing the Indian Army for over last one year has its roots in NDA. It was while filling up the form for this esteemed institution that one of the teachers of the then 14-year-old General – a third generation officer - wrongly filled his year of birth as 1950 instead of 1951.

Thereafter the date of birth reflected in the Indian Military Academy's (IMA) form is also 1950, a fact contested by General Singh. However, the Defence Ministry had determined Army Chief's year of birth as reflected in his NDA and IMA form.

The controversy threatened to send the succession plans of the Indian Army in a tizzy and also saw some unprecedented developments like a serving Army Chief dragging the government of the day to the Supreme Court.

Monday, April 23, 2012

Is the Indian Army being communalised?

This was the article I received from a close aide of General VK Singh. I refrained from publishing it owing to the damage it could have caused to the secular fabric running across the Indian Army, something which is a matter of pride for every Indian.

Later the content of the article became a basis of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a set of retired officers said to be very close the incumbent Army Chief. The PIL was dismissed by the Supreme Court today. I thought of producing the article in full to give an insight to the readers as to what "malicious" and "mud-slinging" match is presently going on within the force.

It is for you to decide where these ensuing controversies will take the force. Here is the long article-

The Question Why

Almost six months have elapsed since General VK Singh took the unprecedented step of becoming the first Chief to seek redress through a statutory complaint to what appears to be one of the simplest of issues – the correction, not change of his date of birth (DOB) – in the records of the MS Branch in Army HQ. Given the fact that there was no confusion or ambiguity on the issue in the AG’s branch (the official record keeper of all Army officers’ personal details) it should have been an open and shut case. The Chief’s statutory complaint was met with howls of protest from the Ministry of Defence and other highly motivated quarters which talked of everything else but the actual issue at hand – the validity of the MS Branch over the AGs Branch in this one case only. Within a few days, the Defence Minister issued a statement in Parliament saying that the Army Chief’s age had been fixed by the Government as 10 May 1950 and that General VK Singh would have to accept it and retire on 31 May 2012. That there existed a pre-determined ‘Line of Succession’ was virtually confirmed by all statements ensuing through leaks planted by MOD in the press, and the final seal to this was given by the Attorney General who stated in writing that unless the Army Chief was forced to accept the date of 1950 and retire, the Government could be in trouble as it would be open to litigation from ‘affected parties’. 

In the prickly backdrop of political paranoia over the role of the Army in the subcontinent, civil-military relations in India have evolved in their own unique way. Since Independence the Indian Armed forces had watched their status whittle away as the bureaucratic establishment slowly but surely took control, abrogating to them selves more and more power. While there had been a few exceptions, most Service Chief’s had rarely stood up to the deep-rooted nexus of political and bureaucratic authority. Once the “Ministry” had spoken, it was usually the last word. The labyrinth of appeals (both statutory, non-statutory and legal recourse) though available on paper, usually were time consuming and more often than not resulted in aggrieved parties getting even more aggrieved and helpless. It is a game with a set of rules that brook no interference. So when General VK Singh refused to accept the arbitrary setting of his DOB as 1950, it stirred up a hornet’s nest.

The issue of the actual DOB itself – so painstakingly documented by various newspapers, magazines and television channels – is of little relevance in this article, the matter being sub-judice after its acceptance by the Supreme Court on February 3. What is of concern here is the manner in which the controversy was first stoked, then fanned and finally, brought into play. Who were the main characters in this unfolding drama and what exactly happened needs to be understood if we are to see the light beyond the smokescreen of the so-called ‘age issue’. Is it really a battle being fought only for one man’s honour or does it run much deeper? These are questions that will perhaps only be answered with the passage of time; but unless these questions are asked, the answers will be swept under the carpet.

The real story begins with General Joginder Jaswant Singh assuming command of the Indian Army on 1st February 2005. A Maratha Light Infantry officer, JJ was the first ever Sikh to rise to the top spot in the Army. In the preceding months, as General NC Vij’s tenure at the helm was coming to an end, there had been a fair amount of ‘langar talk’ in the Army that JJ would be superseded by General Shammi Mehta, an Armoured Corps officer. Though the Government of India by and large always followed the ‘seniority’ principle in selecting service chiefs (the only exception being General AS Vaidya who had been elevated over Lt Gen SK Sinha in 1983) there had been enough uncertainty resulting in the SGPC issuing a strongly worded statement which was published in a few newspapers in favour of JJ taking over as the first ever ‘Sikh’ chief. This statement came in for heavy criticism and nothing more was heard of it again but by his own admission JJ is said that there would have been a blood bath on the streets if he had been superseded.

Right on Target??

The SGPC’s statement probably had little or no bearing on the Appointment Committee which at the time was headed by the prime minister, Dr Man Mohan Singh. Yet the fact remains that for the first time in Independent India, the communal card had been played at the highest level in the Army. General JJ Singh’s own tenure was to run till the end of September 2007, but it is now a well known fact that he had, within months of taking charge, initiated the look down policy which would give a clear idea as to what the line of succession would or could be. That General Deepak Kapoor would take over from JJ himself was well known at the time, but Kapoor’s successor would depend on the board that would be held towards the end of 2005 to decide on which officers were to be cleared for the Lieutenant General rank. 

On 15 April 2006, the results for the board of officers who were promoted from the rank of Major General to Lieutenant General were declassified. At this stage JJ didn’t need the ‘look-down policy’ to tell him that Lt General VK Singh would in all probability succeed Deepak Kapoor. The matter should have ended there, but it obviously didn’t. The ‘look-down policy’ now allowed every officer above the rank of Brigadier who was still climbing the command pyramid to work out his own list where based on various permutations and combinations, the next three/four chiefs could be predicted. But the only list that mattered was JJ’s own list, for as the chief of the Indian army he could tweak events to clear the way for his immediate choice after General VK Singh. Commenting on the issue, Lt Gen (Retd) Satwant Singh questioned the validity of the 'look-down policy' brought into play by JJ, observing that this amounted to earmarking a man for the top job even before he had commanded a division, which was absolutely ridiculous.

At this stage, it was brought to JJ’s notice (by an officer in the MS Branch) that if the chief could truncate and restrict VK Singh’s tenure as the chief to a two year period, then the path could be created for Bikram Singh to take over in 2012. At that point of time, Bikram Singh was not a front-runner as there were other officers ahead of him, but they could be ‘eliminated’ at the COAS’s level itself with a bit of deft manoeuvring. A list was prepared, nick-named ‘Op MOSES’ which implied that the Chief would part the waters for Bikram Singh to smoothly sail through. Like a family tree in reverse, Op MOSES listed potential threats that needed to be neutralized. Heading the list was Brigadier Padam Budhwar and MM Chaudhary, followed by Major Generals Shujan Chatterjee, AK Singh, Ravi Arora and finally VK Singh himself. While all the others had to be ‘fixed’ by manipulating their Brigadier to Major General boards or by other delaying tactics that allowed Bikram Singh to overtake them, in the over all scheme of things it was imperative that VK Singh become the Chief, but only for a limited period.

Path paved for Lt Gen Bikram Singh?

It is common knowledge that after the initial listing of his DOB as 1950 in the UPSC form, the error had been corrected even before VK Singh had joined the NDA in 1966. Consequently his DOB had always been recorded and reflected as 1951. Even at the IMA, where he was ordered to fill his form as per the original UPSC form, the correction was noted and the IMA records sent to the Adjudant General’s branch reflected 1951. On commissioning into the Army, VK Singh’s year of birth was listed as 1951. Even in the MS branch from 2nd Lieutenant to Lieutenant, from Lieutenant to Captain, from Captain to Major, from Major to Lieutenant Colonel, to Colonel, to Brigadier, to Major General and even to Lieutenant General, VK Singh’s DOB was 1951. All records in the AGs branch said 1951, and other than the Army List (which had failed to reflect the correction from the original UPSC form and was based on data forwarded by the MS branch without the requisite verification or checks) everything listed the age as 1951. To further complicate matters, the Army List, considered to be fraught with errors and without any utility, had more or less been discontinued since 1990.

JJ was by then playing God to the hilt! Among Bikram’s contemporaries’, MM Chaudhary and Padam Budhwar had already been passed over from the Major General rank after deliberately playing havoc with their promotional boards, while Ravi Arora, the Gold Medalist from the same course, had been delayed to allow the favoured candidate to surge ahead. For Op MOSES to succeed, it was now imperative for VK Singh to be sent into a tail-spin. The timing was critical – to have created the age issue before his Lieutenant General board would have meant that VK Singh would not be the chief, thereby knocking out Bikram which would have been counter productive. So the moment he was cleared for Lieutenant General, at JJs behest, the then MS fired off the first missile barely two weeks after the declassification of the board results. On 3 May 2006, Lt General Richard Khare wrote to Lt General VK Singh, ‘hand picked’ by the then Chief to command the prestigious 2 Corps, that there was a discrepancy in his DOB and that it had to be resolved. At that time it could hardly have been any thing else but the reflecting of a correction that had not been made forty years ago. It was conveyed to VK Singh that the matter would be resolved after going through the records. However, he was told to reflect his date of birth as 1950 on the vague criterion that he cannot change his age from what was reflected in UPSC application form and resultantly shown as such in Army List. The desired letter having been obtained from the unsuspecting VK Singh, Op MOSES was now in full swing. 

Was the SGPC in on the loop is open to conjecture, but the seeds were sown for someone else to carry the can forward. JJ handed over the baton to Deepak Kapoor and within three months took over as the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh.

Don’t Rock the Boat

Though the epitaph of General Deepak Kapoor’s tenure as the COAS shall have the words ‘Adarsh’ and ‘Sukhna’ engraved on it, the fact of the matter is that the Indian Army was going through one of its lowest ebbs in the eyes of the public. Everyone was talking of ketchup colonels and a host of other scams. In Mumbai, in the wake of the Adarsh scam, people were gleefully pointing out that the Army Day newspaper supplement had advertisements from various building contractors. On the larger canvas, the UPA Government of Dr Man Mohan Singh was reeling under one scam after the other – CWG and 2G being the main headline grabbers. The Radia tapes had even blown the lid of the fourth estate, with senior journalists acting like copywriters while drafting editorials for newspapers and television channels!

JJ’s ‘look-down policy’ wanted VK Singh to be Deepak Kapoor’s successor. Deepak Kapoor on the other hand was desperate to shoot VK Singh down even before he was to be appointed Army Commander for the two officers were at the opposite end of the spectrum, both professionally and otherwise. The stick which JJ had planted in the cupboard to truncate VK Singh’s tenure was now taken out by Deepak Kapoor to cut VK Singh down to size altogether. Accordingly, the MS Branch was asked to rake up the age issue once again. However, two things came to VK Singh’s rescue: a) his professional standing was excellent and b) in the overall scheme of things initiated in 2006, it was imperative that he became the Chief so that the anointed successor could be appointed COAS in 2012. This clearly indicated that there was a higher power at work, which outranked the COAS. The Ministry of Defence, fully aware of all the machinations under both JJ and Deepak Kapoor, not only did nothing to sort out the mess, but like the political leadership of the country, watched from the sidelines as the drama unfolded. A third factor also probably came into play around the time – the then Vice Chief of the Indian Army was Lt General ML Naidu, who like VK Singh was also a Rajput officer and the Colonel of the Regiment to boot. In all likelihood, it would have been Naidu who would have had a moderating influence on Deepak Kapoor, shielding VK Singh from an all out assault from the COAS.

VK Singh was called to AHQ by Naidu who told him that the Chief of the Army Staff was determined to peg his year of birth as 1950. The move was calculated to provoke VK Singh into getting into a head-long confrontation which would have given Deepak Kapoor grounds to move against him for insubordination. Naidu, himself a straightforward and highly respected officer, in all probability advised VK Singh to sign an acceptance letter, especially since Deepak Kapoor had said he would fix the date after an internal enquiry was held. In any case, any such acceptance would hardly have any legal bearing and would shield the officer from a trumped up charge by Deepak Kapoor. Despite Naidu’s advice, VK Singh sent his letter with the rider ‘as directed by you’. This led to a sharp rejoinder from the Chief threatening him outright with displinary action. With the modified ‘acceptance letter’ in hand, the enquiry promised by Deepak Kapoor was promptly cancelled and the date of birth was fixed as 1950.

VK Singh moved to Calcutta where he took over as the Army Commander in 2009. Contrary to popular belief, no Army Commander is appointed on submission of their birth certificate. Only residual service is looked at keeping the DOB at the time of being promoted to Lt General. Almost immediately, the Sukhna land scam was unearthed and despite stiff opposition from Deepak Kapoor, VK Singh decided to order an internal enquiry against the 33 Corps Commander and other senior officers. At this stage a senior officer in the Deepak Kapoor hierarchy pointedly advised VK Singh not to rock the boat.

On his own front the promised enquiry had been called off. VK Singh, now the Eastern Army Commander, wrote to the MS, Lt General Avdesh Prakash asking him on what grounds had the MS branch advised Deepak Kapoor to ‘fix’ his year of birth at 1950. Prakash, by then realized that despite Deepak Kapoor’s efforts to stall the Sukhna enquiry, it was just a matter of time before his name came up in the deal and that he too would be implicated. Having failed to push VK Singh into a corner where he could have been court martialled for insubordination, Deepak Kapoor knew that VK Singh was not going to just lie down and let the matter be. Lt General Naidu had by then retired and had been replaced by Lt General Nobel Thamburaj, so one hurdle in the ‘fix VK’ project had been removed. It was then decided by Deepak Kapoor and the MS, Lt General Prakash, to make it look as if VK Singh was petitioning the MS branch for a ‘change of DOB’ rather than a correction to the redundant Army List. The MS by then needed little prompting, for his only chance of a defence in the Sukhna scam was to try and make it look as if he, an honest and upright officer, had stood in the way of VK Singh’s manipulation to change his DOB. His implication in the Sukhna land scam, he subsequently argued, was because he had thwarted VK Singh who as the Eastern Army commander then vindictively got after him.

Deepak Kapoor’s attempt to use the DOB issue to sack VK Singh before he moved as the Eastern Army Commander had alarmed JJ and the powers that be who did not want Deepak Kapoor to tamper with the line of succession. Apart from the Lt Gen Naidu factor, Deepak Kapoor also failed to get at VK Singh at that stage because the MOD did not blindly support him. But once the MS got into the act, it was always going to be a different story, for the fixing on 1950 was a crucial aspect in the overall game plan initiated in 2006. Lt Gen PC Katoch, in his article in Outlook titled ‘The Shikhandi Salvo’ writes that in 2008 the MS wrote to the MOD saying: “A detailed examination in consultation with AG’s branch with regard to verification of date of birth in respect of IC-24173W Lt Gen VK Singh, AVSM, YSM has been carried out and that date of birth in respect of the officer continues to be maintained as 10 May 1950.” The fact that the MOD neither asked for a the investigation report, nor did it ask the AG’s branch (knowing that it is the authority in the matter) for its views, suggests that by this stage the bureaucratic establishment had been ordered to cement the DOB issue as 1950.
The Appointments Committee, chaired by the Prime Minister for the third time (having earlier appointed JJ and Deepak Kapoor), cleared VK Singh as the 24th Chief of the Army Staff. That the relations between the Deepak Kapoor and VK Singh were frosty at the time of the handing over of the baton was clearly visible in the body language of the new Chief. Apart from the various scams associated with Deepak Kapoor’s tenure, the Chief’s handling of the Northern Army Commander, Lt General HS Panag who had openly accused Deepak Kapoor of being corrupt, had left a bitter taste. Hours after taking over, VK Singh promised the nation in a television interview outside South Block, that his first objective would be to tackle the internal health of the Army. 

According to Wikipedia “in October 2010, it was alleged that Kapoor fraudulently acquired a flat in the now infamous Adarsh Housing Society in Colaba, Mumbai, which was built fraudulently on the land under ‘de-facto’ possession of the Army, for the intended purpose of the welfare of Kargil heroes and their widows. This news brought a lot of adverse publicity to the Indian Army and dented its image. After this news was brought to public, Kapoor claimed that he cancelled his allotment for the flat.” Even in retirement, the former Chief continued to sully the image of the Army. But in the VK Singh saga, he was now a spent force.

As the Army Chief, VK Singh for the first time had the complete facts pertaining to his own ‘case’ before him and when viewed in totality, various pieces began to fall into place. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, the Ministry of Defence was doggedly sticking to VK Singh’s DOB as being 1950 with the intention of forcing the General to retire on 31 May 2012 as against 31 March 2013. The Defence Minister, Arackaparambil Kurien Antony who had assumed office on 26 October 2006, repeatedly let it be known that though he sympathized with VK Singh, his ‘hands were tied’ in the matter and that the pre-determined line of succession had to be maintained at all costs. The constant reference to ‘orders from above’ remained a baffling question; JJ Singh, despite being the chief architect of the ‘line of succession’ was the Governor of Arunachal with no direct authority over the Defence Minister. 

The orders from above virtually gave the bureaucrats in MOD the license to flex muscle; a series of selected leaks began to paint VK Singh as a conniving officer who was desperate to gain an additional ten months in office, either by hook or by crook. RTIs, television debates, magazine and newspaper articles, capitulated the ‘Age Issue’ into headline stuff – generating more inches of news than even perhaps the Chinese debacle in 1962. Field Marshal Montgomery in his book, A History of Warfare while analyzing Eastern Warfare had commented: “The Rajputs were tremendously brave – but equally stupid. Their only tactic appears to have been a rush forward in mass. For all their fury and courage, by advancing thus they were merely sacrificing their lives ‘like moths in a flame’”. The tactic, time and again seems to have been to provoke VK Singh, a Rajput officer, into a headlong confrontation. The first of the real ‘nasties’ first appeared in the magazine India Today wherein the Defence Correspondent wrote an article titled ‘lies of a General’. That the article was entirely based on MOD leaks was blatantly obvious and also glaringly inaccurate, had little or no meaning, for the objective was to provoke the General into accepting his DOB as 1950. 

What VK Singh was up against was slowly becoming obvious. The Principal Secretary in the PMO, TKA Nair told confidants that VK Singh had to go in May 2012 because the ‘Prime Minister had assured his wife that General Bikram Singh would be the next COAS’. The previous Defence Secretary, Vijay Singh, had in Deepak Kapoor’s time already assured the PMO that the ‘needful had been done’ and that VK Singh would not raise the DOB issue again. That VK Singh would make a few noises and eventually settle for a Governorship or some fancy post-retirement cushy job was a foregone conclusion in the GOI’s thinking. Besides, given the sensitivity of civil-military relations in the past, no chief had ever beyond a point rocked the boat. The Statutory Complaint filed by VK Singh shattered that belief. So taken aback was the GOI that Antony issued a statement in Parliament saying that the Government had fixed 1950 after due process the date would stand.
India Today’s earlier article was to look mild in comparison, when towards the end of 2011, the magazine ran a cover story emblazoned on which was the title “Self Before Service”. Not only was the story inside based on MOD leaks and inaccurate facts, the editorial under the hand of the editor Aroon Purie was even more inflammatory. After the rejection of the Statutory Complaint and VK Singh’s petitioning the Supreme Court, others followed, notable among them being Raj Chengappa’s 5-part article in the Chandigarh based Tribune that led observers to dryly observe that the Attorney General must have helped him write it. Most amazingly, on the 3rd of February, a former diplomat, KN Singh, blurted out on CNN-IBN that the Prime Minister himself had ‘authorized’ the articles written by the Tribune editor. 

In a meeting with the Janata Party president, the Defence Minister admitted that the Prime Minister was calling the shots in the age issue. Subramanium Swamy in a letter to the Prime Minister dated 14 January 2012 quotes this conversation with the Defence Minister and pleads with the PM to sort out the issue keeping the overall picture of National security in mind. Antony also subsequently admitted that he never looked at the Statutory Complaint, having simply passed it on to the Attorney General for him to find reasons to reject it out of hand. This fact has already been taken note of by the Supreme Court who on February 3 said that the principles of natural justice have not been adhered to and the procedure adopted for arriving at the rejection of the Statutory Complaint appears to have been vitiated. 

Says Lt General PC Katoch: “This is not a case of an apolitical military going political but deliberate politicizing of an apolitical military.” Whatever General JJ’s compulsions may have been, can the Prime Minister today allow the sordid drama to continue any further, especially since there is enough hints that JJ had the PM’s full support at every stage? On the other hand, having brazened it out thus far, the ‘line of succession’ lobby will try and push VK Singh into a corner, where regardless of the Supreme Court’s ruling, the General be forced to step down just to prove that he is not after an extension.

On VK Singh’s shoulder rests an equally difficult task. Having insulated the Army from any negative feedback by declaring the fight over his age as being purely personal, his dogged stand for what is by and large considered to be a principled stance, has more or less burnt his bridges. The rank and file within the Army are watching, and the outcome could well decide if the country wants an entire generation of JJs and Deepak Kapoors or generals like VK Singh. It is but imperative that systems are put in place to ensure that a similar situation never arises again, and what is perhaps even more important, for the soldier, the bureaucrat and the politician to realize that all is not hunky dowry in the way civil military relations have evolved. This storm in a tea cup could be the best thing that would have happened to the Armed Forces if the right lessons are drawn from it and remedial action taken in the larger interest of National Security. For that to happen, VK Singh too has to step up to the plate and call a spade a spade! In the meantime, the ball is in the judiciary’s court.

(Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely of the writer. The blogger is merely reproducing it and does not affiliate to any of the views whatsoever.)

Friday, April 6, 2012

Admiral (retd) Arun Prakash's take on the controversy involving the Army Chief

The article was published in the private sector's first Hindi defence magazine - Hamari Fauj . The former Navy Chief has given a series of examples showing that military men of par excellency fighting for their honour and integrity have either taken their lives or resigned when the government of the day did not hear their voices.

Here is the interesting take of Admiral Arun Prakash - "Izzat aur Insaaf ki Jung ke usool"

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Another controversy hits Defence establishment

Reports of unauthorized mobilization of troops towards the national capital sparked a coup threat, but the Defence Minister AK Antony sought to brush aside the intent and expressed full confidence in the Indian armed forces.
 
Even as the minister termed the reports hinting at a coup planned by the Indian Army as “absolutely baseless”, he did not deny the facts that the troops from a Mechanised Infantry unit of Hissar – just 150 kms from Delhi – and Army paratroopers from Agra did reach the outskirts of Delhi without keeping the civilian authorities in the loop, as is the Standard Operating Procedures (SoP).

“Absolutely baseless. Army has already explained this. It is usual, natural activities. Nothing unusual. We are absolutely confident of the patriotism of the armed forces,” Antony told reporters on the sidelines of a function here.

Minister of State for Defence MM Pallam Raju went to the extent of terming the report as “anti-national”.

The un-notified movement of the army troops took place on the night of January 16, the day when Army Chief General VK Singh dragged the government to the court over his age issue. The intelligence agencies alerted the South Block and Defence Secretary Shashikant Sharma, who was in Malaysia, was asked to cut short his visit.

On his return, the very next day, Sharma sought an explanation for Indian Army’s Director General of Military Operations Lt Gen AK Chaudhary and sought an explanation. The DGMO is responsible for all the operational matters in the Indian Army. In his report the DGMO termed it a routine military exercise.

Without denying the sequence of events and the explanation sought from the DGMO, the Defence Minister said: “Already the army has explained. We endorse it.” However, many officers who have been posted in Hissar termed the mobilization of troops towards the national capital an unusual thing. The government needs to be notified of all the movements of troops towards or within Delhi. This is part of a procedure established in June 1984 when some mutineers from Sikh units had moved towards the capital after Operation Bluestar.

The army official and the defence ministry are refraining from describing the events as an attempt to “coup”. Instead Antony expressed full confidence in the armed forces and the three service chiefs.

“We are absolutely confident of our armed forces. Do not question their patriotism. They would not do anything to undermine the Indian democracy.

“India is democracy and will continue to be a democracy. Our armed forces will do everything to strengthen the Indian democracy. They cannot do what happens somewhere else,” Antony contended.

The civil-military relationship has been on a downhill since the time the Army Chief took the unprecedented step of taking up cudgels against the government on his age issue. Antony also denied any communication gap between the military and civil establishment.

"There is no communication gap. Nothing wrong with our relation especially with Army Chief. I share a good relation with all three service chiefs," said Antony.

Friday, March 30, 2012

Rogue elements out to create schism between Army and MoD: Army Chief

Statement by the Army Chief strikes a conciliatory note.
 
"For the media to constantly project every issue as a battle between the government and the Army is misleading. The Army and the extension –Chief of Army Staff (CoAS) – are also a part of the government. There are rogue elements in our society who have played an active role in trying to create a schism between the Honourable Raksha Mantri and the COAS. This is untrue and needs to be guarded against.

The timing pertaining to the bribe issue has drawn considerable attention. It is pointed out that after the matter was brought to Honourable Raksha Mantri’s notice certain step had been taken institutionally to keep a wary eye on the retired person, who had offered the bribe. Eighteen months later the person resurfaced in the beginning of March this year and launched a smear campaign under the veil of anonymity alleging that the Army was snooping on the Honourable RM. Once the concerned individual had been identified by Army Headquarters, his identity and antecedents were made public. There have been a string of selective leaks in the past culminating with a public hearing in the letter to the Honourable Prime Minister.

We are duty bound to serve our country and to protect the institutional integrity of the Army at all costs, even if sometimes we have to look within. We have to identify and within confines of the system and the law expose these elements. Freedom of speech and individual opinions need to be respected. But frivolous comments on these issues will only muddy the water."

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Letter leak an act of treason: Army Chief

Breaking his silence since his ‘bribe bombshell’ snowballed into a national controversy, Indian Army Chief General VK Singh on Thursday termed the media leak of his confidential letter written to the Prime Minister as an act of “treason” and said it was an approach to tarnish his reputation.

The Army Chief’s allegations of a lobbyist offering him bribe in his office to clear a defence contract had led to a national outrage and prompting an embarrassed government to order CBI inquiry into the bribery allegations. However, before the controversy could have cooled down, the media leak of the Army Chief’s letter led to demand of his sacking from the political parties.


"This is an outrage! Official communication with the PM, RM (Raksha Mantri) or anybody for that matter with the COAS (Chief of Army Staff) is privileged information. The leaking of the letter should be treated as high treason,” General Singh said in his first reaction on the issue. 

The Army Chief’s reaction has come in the backdrop of frayed relationship between the office of the Chief of Army Staff and the Defence Ministry. On Wednesday the Army Chief was accused of “breach of discipline” by some MPs and his dismissal was sought.

The General also criticized the cynical approach taken by the political class after the contents of the letter projecting a grim state of military preparedness were made public. “This cynical approach to tar my reputation has to stop. The source of the leak has to be found and dealt with ruthlessly," the Army Chief added.

Singh returned from Srinagar late evening. He presently has close to two months before he retires on May 31. Wary of the Army Chief trying to scuttle the elevation of his successor, the government has named the Eastern Army Commander Lt Gen Bikram Singh as the Army Chief designate 90 days in advance as against the norm of the 60 days.

However, saying that he did not want to “add fuel” to the controversy, Defence Minister AK Antony said: “I am not in embarrassing situation. I am comfortable.”

He also termed the letter leak an “anti-national act” and assured to take strongest action in the Indian Penal Code against the culprits. The Defence Minister said the Intelligence Bureau report will be submitted at the earliest.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Antony's statement in Rajya Sabha on the leaking of Army Chief's damning letter

General VK Singh Chief of Army Staff had written to Prime Minister on March 12, 2012 drawing his attention to certain issues relating to our national defence and security. These issues are being examined in MoD (Ministry of Defence). By their very nature, such issues cannot form the subject of public debate.

Publishing the contents of secret communications within government cannot serve our national security. Our defence preparedness has always been strong and I can assure this house and the nation that it our intention to keep it strong. Government has spared no effort, and will do everything necessary, to ensure that our defence forces are provided, equipped and trained to be amongst the best fighting forces in the world.

Since this matter has been raised I wish to assure the house, and through the house he nation, that the government is determined to continue to do all that is necessary to ensure the security and defence of India.